One of the pivotal
episodes in the sacred history of early Islam – and one that according to some
sources took place more than once – is the famous ascension (miʿrāj) of the Prophet. The narratives
in various sources that discuss it make clear the significance of the event(s)
especially for both the theology of prophecy in Islam as well as the
legitimation of narratives about the status of his successors. The ascension
had an important reception in European literature, not least in various
accounts about the ascent into heaven or the descent into hell including Dante
among others. It also played a role in polemics – both intra-Muslim ones, and
also Christian-Muslim ones. In recent years there has been a rise in interest
in the study of the miʿrāj and its
theological and artistic implications. For example, Christiane Gruber andFrederick Colby edited a volume on cross-cultural influence in different Muslim
literatures published in 2010 by Indiana University Press. Earlier, Mohammad Ali
Amir-Moezzi, who has written extensively on ascension narratives in classical
Shiʿi texts, edited a volume entitled Le
voyage initiatique en terre d’Islam published in Paris in 1996 that
included studies of the medieval European reception of the miʿrāj narratives. More recently, Brooke Olson Vucukic published a
book with Routlege in 2005 on the significance of miʿrāj narratives in the formative literature of Islam. So there is
an overlap between some of these studies and the concerns of Buckley who seems
to be aware of these studies as well as a number of recent works in Arabic. One
cannot, of course, expect Buckley’s study to be exhaustive given the many works
on the narratives published in Persian, Turkish, Urdu and other languages used
by Muslims.
Buckley’s work is a
contribution to understanding the intellectual history in Islamic literatures
and other forms of reception of Islamic narratives through a focus upon one
narrative, thereby revealing the vitality of those modes of inquiry and the
different ways in which broadly the same narrative can be received, understood,
interpreted, and even rejected. Throughout he remains interested in how modern
Muslims and other understand and try to make sense of the narrative,
demonstrating quite significantly why the miʿrāj
is not just an episode of early sacred history. The first chapter introduces
the topic starting with the mention of the night journey (isrāʾ) in Qurʾan 17:1, moving onto the simple form in the earliest
biography of the Prophet of Ibn Isḥāq (d. 768) – although he clearly means the
recension by Ibn Hishām which is from the following century – onto sūrat
al-Najm (Qurʾan 53) which is often associated with the miʿrāj, and then moving onto a long narrative given in the exegesis
on the Qurʾanic verse by the Imāmī exegete al-Qummī (d. c. 919). The function
of the chapter is merely to introduce the narrative and does not discuss what
it means since that is precisely the function of the chapters that follow. The
second chapter deals with the source texts in Qurʾan and hadith and how they
have been debated especially in the modern period within the context of hadith
criticism, rejection, and the rationalist justification of the classical texts.
Starting from the theological agreement between Sunnis and Shiʿa on the
necessity of belief in the ascension, he discusses the attacks on the accretion
of many hadith narratives especially the common theme found in criticism of
hadith among Muslims about texts that they feel are fabricated which is to
identify them as corruption that came from Biblical and extra-Biblical material
called isrāʾīlīyat. However, what the
chapter shows is that the interpretative strategies adopted by different groups
is similar including the solution to the discrepancy in narratives by arguing
that the miʿrāj happened numerous
times over the lifetime of the Prophet. In fact, the accumulation of narratives
seems to have happened rather early in the period of the redaction of hadith
narratives as al-Ṭabarī (d. 923) testifies; it also raises the theme that is
taken up later in the book that the discrepancy between narratives reveals
different attempts at vindicating a particular sectarian reading. While this
chapter and subsequent ones show the breadth of Buckley’s reading in the
traditional and modern literature, one wonders sometimes if there are criteria
for selecting works and authors that he discusses. Clearly he could not have
mastered the whole literature and one finds many examples of him not be aware
of what he is citing: for example, on page 25 he cites a hadith on the
authority of ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm al-Ḥasanī cited by the Imāmī tradent al-Ṣadūq (d.
991) but seems to be unaware of who he was. The link is significant as ʿAbd
al-ʿAẓīm is both a descendent of the Prophet through his grandson al-Ḥasan as
well as a prominent Imāmī narrator from the later Imams and was considered to
be an authority; in fact, al-Ṣadūq was later buried in the mausoleum complex of
ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm whose shrine in the southern outskirts of Tehran remains a
popular place of pilgrimage. Some contextualisation would also be useful to
explain who the critics are – even if ostensibly they are making the same sort
of rationalist critique, it may be deployed for different uses.
The next two
chapters deal with one of the central debates about the ascension: was it a
physical and material movement, or was it a spiritual event? The first of these
links a physical ascension with the miraculous power of the Prophet and shows
how even modern ‘scientific’ interpretations are used to justify such a reading
– it does seem to be the case that most major theologians held that the miʿrāj was both in body and spirit. Once
again one wonders about the selection of sources: on page 84, the views of a
certain Aroj Ali Matubbar is mentioned denying a physical ascension – it is not
clear to me what this adds to the argument or what justifies the inclusion of
his opinion. Chapter four that follows considers the spiritual ascension. Proponents
of a spiritual journey could also cite early texts in support. But it seems
that the real impetus for the position seems to be a broadly philosophical and
Neoplatonic context that privileges the spiritual over the physical. In this
vein, Buckley cites the famous Persian miʿrājnāma
attributed to Avicenna (d. 1037) – without discussing the scholarly debate that
tends to reject the attribution. He discusses a number of South Asian and
Egyptian modernists who rejected a physical reading of the ascension, and ends
the chapter with an interesting discussing from the Imāmī thinker Shaykh Aḥmad
al-Aḥsāʾī (d. 1826) on the nature of the ascension in the archetypal,
non-material world of Hūrqalyā. Once again, what the discussion reveals is how
thinkers set forth positions are part of a manner in which to distinguish their
theological contribution: Shaykhīya in the case of al-Aḥsāʾī and his followers,
and the Imāmī philosophical tradition in the case of Ṭabāṭabāʾī (d. 1981) and
his. And once again we see a synthesis emerging: the ascension is both spiritual
and bodily but with a body unlike any other body. Chapter five that follows and
is very short seems rather redundant: it reiterates the point about some
interpreters rejecting a rationalist interpretation and affirming the
miraculous. It also indicates one of the weaknesses of the book: the absence of
a meticulous edit that would tighten the argument and extricate unnecessary and
irrelevant discussions.
Chapter six moves
onto the miʿrāj narrative in the
Shiʿi tradition and how it is used to vindicate Shiʿi theology and sacred
history. In practice this requires Buckley to discuss Sunni usages as well for
the same effect. For the Shiʿa, the ascension, like other significant episodes
in the life of the Prophet, is interpreted to demonstrate the fulfilment of
prophecy in the imamate of his family starting with ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib and to
vindicate Shiʿi rituals and practices. This chapter ends with a brief
consideration of the dating and redaction of Shiʿi hadith, a topic on which
Buckley has written elsewhere; the important point concerns the idea of a
common Islamic heritage of narratives that make their way into different
redactions, and to critique much of the practice of Orientalist scholarship
that tends to study Sunni material alone and dismisses much Shiʿi material as
later fabrication. A careful study of the texts suggests that they originate in
the same period. Once again we have a case of Buckley not knowing whom he is
quoting: he cites a modern English translation of a Persian text on the miʿrāj by the Safavid thinker Muḥsin Fayḍ
Kāshānī (d. 1680) on page 169 and suggests that he is a contemporary cleric and
has him citing the contemporary jurist Nāṣir Makārim Shīrāzī – this is a
classic case of mistaking the notes of a translator for the work of the
original author and signals one of the problems in some contemporary Muslim
publishing in which the original author of a translation is not clearly and
adequately introduced.
The final chapter on
Western perspectives collects a series of what he calls vignettes on the
reception of ascension narratives from medieval Christian polemics to recent
forays in literature. This happens to be the longest chapter. Along the way he
discusses the thesis of Asin Palacios of the influence of miʿrāj narratives upon Dante. There is much new and interesting
material here. But one wonders how it is related to the other chapters. The
absence of a conclusion means that when one has finished reading what is an
interesting set of studies, one wonders what the overall argument is and how
this study actually works as a book. There is much to enjoy in this book and
details and references to follow up; a number of important themes are raised
concerning Muslim theological positions on proof texts, on prophecy, on the
miraculous, on the nature of the human and whether a dualism of body and spirit
is affirmed or denied. But overall, Buckley’s The Night Journey and Ascension in Islam is difficult to assess
because ultimately there is no argument.